Last updated: 12/31/2023

How do Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests work for UAP documents?

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has become an essential tool for UAP researchers seeking government documents. While the process can be complex and time-consuming, FOIA has yielded significant revelations about government UAP investigations, often providing the documentary evidence that forces official acknowledgment of programs and incidents.

FOIA Fundamentals

The Act: Enacted in 1966, FOIA provides that any person has the right to request access to federal agency records or information, except to the extent the records are protected from disclosure by any of nine exemptions.

Core Principle: “Maximum responsible disclosure” - agencies must release information unless it falls under specific exemptions or would cause foreseeable harm.

Covered Agencies:

  • All executive branch departments
  • Military departments
  • Government corporations
  • Independent regulatory agencies
  • Does NOT cover Congress, courts, or the President’s immediate staff

Basic Process

Standard Steps:

  1. Identify the Agency: Determine which agency likely has the records
  2. Draft Request: Write a clear, specific request letter
  3. Submit Request: Send via mail, fax, email, or online portal
  4. Acknowledgment: Agency confirms receipt and assigns tracking number
  5. Processing: Search, review, and redaction process
  6. Response: Release, partial release, or denial
  7. Appeal: Administrative appeal if unsatisfied
  8. Litigation: Federal court challenge if necessary

Crafting Effective UAP FOIA Requests

Research Before Requesting

Preliminary Steps:

  • Check agency reading rooms for already-released documents
  • Search FOIA libraries and databases
  • Review previous successful requests
  • Identify specific incidents, dates, locations
  • Understand agency structure and responsibilities

Key Databases:

  • The Black Vault
  • FOIA.gov
  • Agency FOIA reading rooms
  • National Archives
  • NSA/CIA/FBI online libraries

Writing the Request

Essential Elements:

Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request

Dear FOIA Officer,

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552).

I request that a copy of the following documents [or documents containing the following information] be provided to me:

[Specific description of records sought]

Time frame: [Specific dates]
Key terms: [Relevant keywords]
Scope: [Limiting factors]

I am willing to pay fees for this request up to a maximum of $[amount]. If you estimate that the fees will exceed this limit, please inform me first.

[Fee waiver request if applicable]

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,
[Name and contact information]

Specificity is Key

Good Request Example: “All documents related to the UAP encounter by USS Nimitz strike group personnel between November 10-16, 2004, including but not limited to:

  • Pilot reports and debriefs
  • Radar logs and data
  • Ship communications logs
  • Intelligence assessments
  • Photographs or videos”

Poor Request Example: “All UFO files”

Common Exemptions for UAP Documents

Exemption (b)(1): National Security

Most Common for UAP Records:

  • Classified sensor capabilities
  • Intelligence methods
  • Foreign government information
  • Ongoing operations
  • Technology assessments

Challenging (b)(1):

  • Request Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR)
  • Cite public interest
  • Point to similar releases
  • Request segregable portions
  • Note passage of time

Exemption (b)(3): Statutory Prohibitions

Relevant Statutes:

  • National Security Act (CIA operational files)
  • NSA Act (signals intelligence)
  • Atomic Energy Act (nuclear-related UAP)
  • Patent Secrecy Act (advanced technology)
  • Arms Export Control Act (foreign technology)

Exemption (b)(5): Deliberative Process

Common Uses:

  • Internal policy discussions
  • Draft reports and recommendations
  • Staff opinions and advice
  • Pre-decisional documents
  • Working papers

Overcoming (b)(5):

  • Request final versions only
  • Argue policy already adopted
  • Show passage of time
  • Demonstrate public interest
  • Request factual portions

Exemption (b)(6): Personal Privacy

UAP Context:

  • Witness names and addresses
  • Military personnel identities
  • Medical information
  • Personal contact details
  • Employment records

Balancing Test: Agencies weigh privacy interest against public interest in disclosure

Exemption (b)(7): Law Enforcement

Subcategories Relevant to UAP:

  • (b)(7)(A): Ongoing investigations
  • (b)(7)(C): Personal privacy in law enforcement
  • (b)(7)(D): Confidential sources
  • (b)(7)(E): Law enforcement techniques
  • (b)(7)(F): Endanger safety

Successful FOIA Strategies

Target Multiple Agencies

Key Agencies for UAP Records:

  1. Department of Defense:

    • AARO
    • DIA
    • Service branches
    • Combatant commands
    • DARPA

  2. Intelligence Community:

    • CIA
    • NSA
    • NRO
    • NGA
    • ODNI

  3. Other Agencies:

    • FBI
    • FAA
    • NASA
    • Department of Energy
    • State Department

Use Different Approaches

Multiple Angles:

  • Request same incident from different agencies
  • Seek different types of records (emails, reports, logs)
  • Try various date ranges
  • Use different keywords
  • Request metadata or indexes

Fee Waiver Requests

Qualifying Factors:

  1. Public interest in disclosure
  2. Not primarily commercial interest
  3. Contributes to public understanding
  4. Significant contribution likely

Sample Language: “I request a waiver of all fees for this request. Disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest because it will contribute significantly to public understanding of government UAP investigations and policy. I am not seeking this information for commercial purposes but rather for research and public education.”

Notable UAP FOIA Successes

Historical Releases

Project Blue Book Files:

  • Requester: Various researchers
  • Result: Entire archive eventually released
  • Impact: Foundation for modern UAP research

CIA UFO Documents (1978):

  • Requester: Ground Saucer Watch
  • Result: 900+ pages after lawsuit
  • Impact: Revealed CIA involvement despite denials

NSA UFO Documents:

  • Requester: CAUS (Citizens Against UFO Secrecy)
  • Result: Heavily redacted release after court battle
  • Impact: Confirmed NSA UAP interest

Recent Successes

AATIP Existence:

  • Various requesters (2009-2017)
  • Initial denials
  • Eventually confirmed program existence
  • Led to major disclosure moment

Navy UAP Videos:

  • Multiple requests (2007-2019)
  • Initially classified
  • Eventually authenticated and released
  • Changed public discourse

FAA Communications:

  • Pilot report procedures
  • ATC protocols
  • Near-miss incidents
  • Safety assessments

Processing Challenges

Common Delays

Typical Issues:

  • Backlog (years-long waits common)
  • Complex searches across systems
  • Classification reviews
  • Multi-agency coordination
  • Redaction time

Expedited Processing: Available for:

  • Imminent threat to life/safety
  • Urgency to inform public
  • Loss of due process rights
  • Humanitarian reasons

Glomar Responses

“Cannot Confirm or Deny”: Agencies may refuse to confirm existence of records when:

  • Acknowledgment itself would reveal classified information
  • Ongoing operations involved
  • Intelligence equities present
  • Foreign relations impact

Challenging Glomar:

  • Show official acknowledgment elsewhere
  • Demonstrate prior releases
  • Argue no logical exemption
  • Point to passage of time

Appeals Process

Administrative Appeals

When to Appeal:

  • No records found (when you know they exist)
  • Excessive redactions
  • Improper exemption claims
  • Inadequate search
  • Fee issues

Appeal Elements:

  1. Timeliness (usually 90 days)
  2. Specific objections
  3. Legal arguments
  4. Public interest emphasis
  5. Request for different reviewer

Litigation Options

When to Sue:

  • Administrative remedies exhausted
  • Pattern of wrongful denials
  • Significant public interest
  • Strong legal arguments
  • Resources available

Notable UAP FOIA Lawsuits:

  • CAUS v. NSA (1980)
  • Judicial Watch v. DOD (2019)
  • Black Vault v. CIA (ongoing)
  • Various media organizations

Best Practices

Record Keeping

Document Everything:

  • Copy of original request
  • All correspondence
  • Tracking numbers
  • Phone call notes
  • Processing timeline

Follow-Up Strategies

Persistent Engagement:

  • Regular status inquiries
  • Constructive dialogue with FOIA officers
  • Clarifications when needed
  • Narrowing if necessary
  • Building relationships

Collaboration Benefits

Working with Others:

  • Share successful request templates
  • Coordinate different angles
  • Pool resources for litigation
  • Exchange released documents
  • Build comprehensive archives

Tips for UAP Researchers

Start Specific

Focused Requests Work Better:

  • Single incidents
  • Specific date ranges
  • Named programs
  • Known code names
  • Particular personnel

Use Official Terminology

Government Language:

  • “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” not “UFO”
  • “Anomalous” not “alien”
  • Official program names
  • Military terminology
  • Bureaucratic phrases

Mine Released Documents

Finding Leads:

  • Reference numbers
  • Redacted program names
  • Partial dates
  • Personnel names
  • Related incidents

Be Patient but Persistent

Long-term View:

  • Expect delays
  • Plan for appeals
  • Build incrementally
  • Maintain pressure
  • Celebrate small wins

Future of FOIA and UAP

Legislative Improvements

Proposed Reforms:

  • Mandatory declassification timelines
  • Reduced exemption scope
  • Proactive disclosure requirements
  • Penalty enforcement
  • Technology modernization

Technology Advances

Improving Process:

  • AI-assisted redaction
  • Automated searches
  • Digital archives
  • Online tracking
  • Bulk processing

Conclusion

FOIA remains a critical tool for UAP transparency despite its limitations:

Successes:

  • Forced acknowledgment of programs
  • Released significant documents
  • Built historical record
  • Enabled research
  • Increased accountability

Challenges:

  • Extensive redactions
  • Long delays
  • High exemption use
  • Resource requirements
  • Variable compliance

Key Strategies:

  1. Research thoroughly before requesting
  2. Write specific, clear requests
  3. Target multiple agencies
  4. Prepare for appeals
  5. Collaborate with others

The FOIA process for UAP documents requires patience, persistence, and strategy. While agencies often resist disclosure, particularly for sensitive UAP information, the law provides powerful tools for determined researchers. Each successful release builds upon previous efforts, gradually expanding public knowledge of government UAP activities.

As government UAP transparency increases, FOIA will continue playing a vital role in holding agencies accountable and uncovering the full extent of official knowledge about these phenomena. The key is understanding the process, using it strategically, and maintaining pressure for the public disclosure that democratic governance demands.

TAGS: foia transparency documents declassification public-records

▶ RELATED QUESTIONS

→

→

→