Government Programs Last updated: 3/24/2024

What are the known U.S. government programs that have studied UFOs/UAPs?

The U.S. government’s involvement in UFO/UAP research spans over 75 years, with programs ranging from public Air Force projects to classified Pentagon initiatives only recently acknowledged.

Historical Programs (1947-1969)

Project Sign (1947-1949)

  • First official UFO study
  • Concluded some UFOs were interplanetary
  • Report rejected and destroyed by Air Force leadership
  • Replaced due to extraterrestrial hypothesis

Project Grudge (1949-1952)

  • Debunking-focused successor
  • Aimed to explain away all sightings
  • Public relations effort to reduce UFO reports
  • Criticized for poor investigation methods

Project Blue Book (1952-1969)

  • Longest-running public program
  • 12,618 cases investigated
  • 701 remained unexplained
  • Terminated after Condon Report

The Hidden Years (1969-2007)

Despite official claims, evidence suggests continued classified study:

  • Project Moon Dust: Retrieved space debris (possible UFO materials)
  • Operation Blue Fly: Quick reaction teams for anomalous objects
  • DSP Satellite Program: Detected “fastwalkers” in space

Modern Era Programs (2007-Present)

AAWSAP (2007-2012)

Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program

  • $22 million funding via Senator Harry Reid
  • Contracted to Bigelow Aerospace
  • Studied UFOs and paranormal phenomena
  • Produced 38 classified reports

AATIP (2007-2017?)

Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program

  • Led by Luis Elizondo
  • Focused on military UFO encounters
  • Analyzed Navy pilot videos
  • Existence revealed by NY Times in 2017

UAP Task Force (2020-2022)

  • Established by Deputy Secretary of Defense
  • First official acknowledgment since Blue Book
  • Produced June 2021 UAP Report to Congress
  • Confirmed 144 encounters, 1 explained

AARO (2022-Present)

All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office

  • Expanded scope beyond aerial phenomena
  • Congressional mandate with regular reporting
  • Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick first director
  • Investigating current and historical cases

Special Access Programs (SAPs)

Whistleblowers allege additional programs:

Alleged Recovery Programs

  • “The Program”: Crash retrieval operations
  • Reverse Engineering: Study of recovered materials
  • Biological Studies: Non-human entity research

Compartmentalized Research

  • Private aerospace contractor involvement
  • “Need to know” basis limiting oversight
  • Congressional members claim exclusion
  • Inspector General investigations ongoing

International Cooperation

Recent developments include:

  • Five Eyes intelligence sharing on UAP
  • NATO working groups established
  • United Nations discussions initiated

Key Revelations

  1. Continuous Study: Gap between Blue Book and modern programs likely filled by classified work
  2. Private Contractor Role: Most research potentially in corporate facilities
  3. Congressional Oversight: Historically limited, now expanding
  4. Multi-Domain Focus: Modern programs study air, sea, space phenomena

Current Legislative Actions

UAP Disclosure Act (2023-2024)

  • Eminent domain for recovered materials
  • Review board for declassification
  • Protections for whistleblowers
  • Timeline for public disclosure

Schumer-Rounds Amendment

  • Presidential authority over UAP records
  • Independent review board creation
  • Presumption of disclosure
  • Corporate contractor compliance

What We Don’t Know

  • Full scope of Special Access Programs
  • Extent of recovered materials
  • Results of reverse-engineering efforts
  • International program coordination
  • Private contractor holdings

The evolution from Project Sign to AARO represents not just bureaucratic reshuffling, but a fundamental shift in how the U.S. government approaches the phenomenon—from denial and debunking to acknowledgment and investigation.